Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Alameda Census Tracts
  • County : Alameda Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

Current Value:
18.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 18.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 18.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (18.1%), Newark has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (16.6%), Newark has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Substance Use Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
1,143.2
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 1,143.2 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1,416.3 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1,623.1.
Alameda County Cities/Places
(2012-2014)
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (1,537.2), Newark has a value of 1,143.2 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(1,537.2)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1,275.4), Newark has a value of 1,143.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1,275.4 in 2012-2014)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (1,143.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1,148.6).
Prior Value
(1,148.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Cancer

4.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.5%), Newark has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Newark has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults with Cancer (Non-Skin) or Melanoma

Current Value:
5.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (6.4%), Newark has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (8.2%), Newark has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
79.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 79.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 79.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (79.0%), Newark has a value of 79.0%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(79.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Newark has a value of 79.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Colon Cancer Screening: Sigmoidoscopy Past 5 Years and FOBT Past 3 Years, Colonoscopy Past 10 Years, or FOBT Past Year

66.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 66.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 66.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (67.7%), Newark has a value of 66.2% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Newark has a value of 66.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
58.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 58.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 58.7% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 65.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (59.5%), Newark has a value of 58.7% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(59.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (66.3%), Newark has a value of 58.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
75.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 75.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 75.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,874 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (74.5%), Newark has a value of 75.2% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(74.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (76.5%), Newark has a value of 75.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Diabetes

14.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (12.4%), Newark has a value of 14.8% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (14.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Diabetes Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Diabetes Hospitalization Rate

999.6
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 999.6 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 771.6 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 994.4.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (879.6), Newark has a value of 999.6 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(879.6)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1,017.7), Newark has a value of 999.6 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1,017.7)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (999.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1,067.7).
Prior Value
(1,067.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (21.5%), Newark has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Newark has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Newark has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Children with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Children with a Disability

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (3.0%), Newark has a value of 2.0%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Newark has a value of 2.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Newark has a value of 2.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.0%), Newark has a value of 3.3%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Newark has a value of 3.3%.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Newark has a value of 3.3%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Persons with a Disability

8.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.5%), Newark has a value of 8.7%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Newark has a value of 8.7%.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Newark has a value of 8.7%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.3%), Newark has a value of 2.4%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.9%), Newark has a value of 2.4%.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Newark has a value of 2.4%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.3%), Newark has a value of 1.6%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.7%), Newark has a value of 1.6%.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Newark has a value of 1.6%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (1.8%), Newark has a value of 0.9%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.1%), Newark has a value of 0.9%.
CA Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Newark has a value of 0.9%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.9%), Newark has a value of 4.2%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Newark has a value of 4.2%.
CA Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Newark has a value of 4.2%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Veterans with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Veterans with a Disability

22.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (24.6%), Newark has a value of 22.1%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.7%), Newark has a value of 22.1%.
CA Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (29.8%), Newark has a value of 22.1%.
US Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Current Value:
24.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (26.6%), Newark has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (24.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.6%).
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
69.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 69.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 69.3% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (70.9%), Newark has a value of 69.3% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(70.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (76.1%), Newark has a value of 69.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:
91.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (92.8%), Newark has a value of 91.5% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (91.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (91.9%).
Prior Value
(91.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults without Health Insurance

7.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.8%), Newark has a value of 7.6% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Newark has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Avoidable Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
3,438.4
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 3,438.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,957.6 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,623.1.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (3,740.6), Newark has a value of 3,438.4 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(3,740.6)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3,950.2), Newark has a value of 3,438.4 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3,950.2)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (3,438.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,700.4).
Prior Value
(3,700.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

7.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.5%), Newark has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (7.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.3%).
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Information Technology

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
96.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (93.0%), Newark has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(93.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Newark has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Newark has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:
98.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 98.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 98.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (96.4%), Newark has a value of 98.9% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(96.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Newark has a value of 98.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Newark has a value of 98.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
96.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 96.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 96.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (94.6%), Newark has a value of 96.7% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (93.4%), Newark has a value of 96.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Newark has a value of 96.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults who Experienced a Stroke

2.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.8%), Newark has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Newark has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
4.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.1%), Newark has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Newark has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

70.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 70.5% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 70.5% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,969 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (72.2%), Newark has a value of 70.5% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(72.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Newark has a value of 70.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults with Heart Disease

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Heart Disease

7.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.1%), Newark has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (7.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.5%).
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Cholesterol Test History

85.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 85.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 85.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,969 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (84.9%), Newark has a value of 85.1% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(84.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Newark has a value of 85.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Congesitve Heart Failure Hospitalizations

Current Value:
179.8
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 179.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 174.7 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 222.4.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (195.9), Newark has a value of 179.8 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(195.9)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (174.1), Newark has a value of 179.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(174.1)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (179.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (206.4).
Prior Value
(206.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Coronary Heart Disease Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
290.7
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 290.7 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 231.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 266.5.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (232.8), Newark has a value of 290.7 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(232.8)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (247.2), Newark has a value of 290.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(247.2)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (290.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (313.1).
Prior Value
(313.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark High Cholesterol Prevalence

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark High Cholesterol Prevalence

32.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,969 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (33.4%), Newark has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(33.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (35.5%), Newark has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
28.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 28.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 28.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (28.8%), Newark has a value of 28.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Newark has a value of 28.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Stroke Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Stroke Hospitalization Rate

196.3
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 196.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 196.0 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 214.7.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (191.3), Newark has a value of 196.3 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(191.3)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (215.5), Newark has a value of 196.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(215.5)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (196.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (212.8).
Prior Value
(212.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
18.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 18.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 18.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (19.8%), Newark has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(19.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (20.7%), Newark has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(20.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress

Current Value:
18.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (18.8%), Newark has a value of 18.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (18.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

13.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (14.1%), Newark has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Newark has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Severe Mental Illness Related Emergency Department Visits

2,294.4
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 2,294.4 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 387.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 487.4.
Alameda County Cities/Places
(2012-2014)
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2,285.9), Newark has a value of 2,294.4 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2,285.9)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (320.0), Newark has a value of 2,294.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(320.0 in 2012-2014)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (2,294.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (391.5).
Prior Value
(391.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages

Current Value:
10.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.6%), Newark has a value of 10.4% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (10.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

31.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 31.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 26.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,471 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 31.3% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,400 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (30.9%), Newark has a value of 31.3% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(30.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Newark has a value of 31.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

38.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 38.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 38.3% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,400 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (38.2%), Newark has a value of 38.3% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Newark has a value of 38.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults 65+ with a Disability

35.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (30.8%), Newark has a value of 35.1%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(30.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (33.5%), Newark has a value of 35.1%.
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Newark has a value of 35.1%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
10.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (11.1%), Newark has a value of 10.8%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.9%), Newark has a value of 10.8%.
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Newark has a value of 10.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.7%), Newark has a value of 7.6%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Newark has a value of 7.6%.
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Newark has a value of 7.6%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.5%), Newark has a value of 3.4%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Newark has a value of 3.4%.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Newark has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
21.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (16.1%), Newark has a value of 21.1%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (16.4%), Newark has a value of 21.1%.
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Newark has a value of 21.1%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Oral Health

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,871 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.8%), Newark has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.2%), Newark has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults who Visited a Dentist

66.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 66.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 66.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (65.4%), Newark has a value of 66.5% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(65.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (63.9%), Newark has a value of 66.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(63.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Children who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Children who Visited a Dentist

84.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (85.2%), Newark has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(85.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (84.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (89.2%).
Prior Value
(89.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Acute Preventable Hospitalizations

Current Value:
493.5
Per 100,000 population
(2009-2011)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 493.5 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 436.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 471.5.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (447.7), Newark has a value of 493.5 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(447.7)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (500.63), Newark has a value of 493.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(500.63)
The Alameda County value is compared to the CA State value.

City/Place: Newark Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Arthritis

16.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (20.5%), Newark has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(20.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (26.6%), Newark has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Kidney Disease

2.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.7%), Newark has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Newark has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Chronic Preventable Hospitalizations

Current Value:
740.1
Per 100,000 population
(2009-2011)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 740.1 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 618.35 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 739.53.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (787.5), Newark has a value of 740.1 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(787.5)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (786.98), Newark has a value of 740.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(786.98)
The Alameda County value is compared to the CA State value.

City/Place: Newark Hypertension Hospitalizations

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Hypertension Hospitalizations

927.8
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 927.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 917.7 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1,011.0.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (986.4), Newark has a value of 927.8 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(986.4)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1,234.8), Newark has a value of 927.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1,234.8)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (927.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1,009.5).
Prior Value
(1,009.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Self-Inflicted Injury Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
94.7
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 94.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 92.2 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 116.7.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (103.1), Newark has a value of 94.7 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(103.1)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (115.5), Newark has a value of 94.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(115.5)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 California State value
Compared to the prior value, Newark (94.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (91.6).
Prior Value
(91.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults who are Sedentary

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults who are Sedentary

18.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 18.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 18.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Newark has a value of 18.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Prevention & Safety

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Motor Vehicle Crash Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
718.6
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 718.6 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 718.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 830.7.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (809.3), Newark has a value of 718.6 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(809.3)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (747.3), Newark has a value of 718.6 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(747.3)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 California State value
Compared to the prior value, Newark (718.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (685.5).
Prior Value
(685.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Unintentional Injury Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
6,274.8
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 6,274.8 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6,274.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7,155.2.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (6,749.6), Newark has a value of 6,274.8 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(6,749.6)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (6,531.7), Newark has a value of 6,274.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6,531.7)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 California State value
Compared to the prior value, Newark (6,274.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6,298.2).
Prior Value
(6,298.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Asthma

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Asthma

18.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (20.1%), Newark has a value of 18.7% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (18.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Adults with COPD

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults with COPD

3.7%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 3.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 3.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.3%), Newark has a value of 3.7% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Newark has a value of 3.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults with Current Asthma

8.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.9%), Newark has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (9.9%), Newark has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Asthma Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
2,174.2
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 2,174.2 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 481.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 661.5.
Alameda County Cities/Places
(2012-2014)
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2,355.1), Newark has a value of 2,174.2 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2,355.1)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (498.7), Newark has a value of 2,174.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(498.7 in 2012-2014)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 California State value
Compared to the prior value, Newark (2,174.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (617.4).
Prior Value
(617.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Children and Teens with Asthma

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Children and Teens with Asthma

6.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (6.9%), Newark has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (6.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults who Smoke

5.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.8%), Newark has a value of 5.8%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (5.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.9%).
Prior Value
(4.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

City/Place: Newark Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

Current Value:
4.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.5%), Newark has a value of 4.5%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (4.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Adults Who Are Obese

18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 18.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 18.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Newark has a value of 18.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Children who are Overweight for Age

Current Value:
11.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (11.6%), Newark has a value of 11.8% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (11.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Obesity-Related Hospitalizations

Current Value:
417.1
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 417.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 342.3 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 422.9.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (367.3), Newark has a value of 417.1 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(367.3)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (396.8), Newark has a value of 417.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(396.8)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (417.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (395.5).
Prior Value
(395.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Teens who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:
42.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (39.2%), Newark has a value of 42.9% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(39.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (42.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

83.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (85.1%), Newark has a value of 83.1% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(85.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (83.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (87.8%).
Prior Value
(87.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Child and Teen Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

96.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (97.0%), Newark has a value of 96.8% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(97.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.

City/Place: Newark Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Insufficient Sleep

34.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 34.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 34.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (34.9%), Newark has a value of 34.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(34.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (36.0%), Newark has a value of 34.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

City/Place: Newark Life Expectancy

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Life Expectancy

82.9
Years
(2011-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (82.0), Newark has a value of 82.9 which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(82.0)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (82.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.4).
Prior Value
(82.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Older Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

70.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (74.8%), Newark has a value of 70.4% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(74.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (70.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (76.1%).
Prior Value
(76.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (11.0%), Newark has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.7%), Newark has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Current Value:
14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (15.5%), Newark has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (17.9%), Newark has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Assault Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
185.3
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Newark has a value of 185.3 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 234.9 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 305.6.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (422.2), Newark has a value of 185.3 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(422.2)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (322.6), Newark has a value of 185.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(322.6)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 California State value
Compared to the prior value, Newark (185.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (218.3).
Prior Value
(218.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Average Household Size

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Average Household Size

3.20
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.80), Newark has a value of 3.20.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.80)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.90), Newark has a value of 3.20.
CA Value
(2.90)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Newark has a value of 3.20.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Foreign Born Persons

42.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (33.3%), Newark has a value of 42.3%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (26.5%), Newark has a value of 42.3%.
CA Value
(26.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Newark has a value of 42.3%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Veteran Population

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Veteran Population

3.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (3.4%), Newark has a value of 3.2%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.7%), Newark has a value of 3.2%.
CA Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Newark has a value of 3.2%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
16.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 16.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 16.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (19.0%), Newark has a value of 16.8% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Newark has a value of 16.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Newark has a value of 16.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark People 65+ Living Alone

12.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,328 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (22.6%), Newark has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(22.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Newark has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Newark has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Mean Travel Time to Work

31.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 31.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.2 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,265 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 31.2 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (32.6), Newark has a value of 31.2 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(32.6)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Newark has a value of 31.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Newark has a value of 31.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (10.6%), Newark has a value of 3.6% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), Newark has a value of 3.6%.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Newark has a value of 3.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

City/Place: Newark Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Workers who Drive Alone to Work

60.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 60.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 79.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,454 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 60.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 85.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,625 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (54.7%), Newark has a value of 60.4% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(54.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), Newark has a value of 60.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Newark has a value of 60.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Workers who Walk to Work

1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.8%), Newark has a value of 1.7% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), Newark has a value of 1.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Newark has a value of 1.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Employment

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
64.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 64.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 45.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,474 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 64.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,799 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (61.3%), Newark has a value of 64.9% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(61.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (57.8%), Newark has a value of 64.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Newark has a value of 64.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
68.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 68.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 68.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (63.6%), Newark has a value of 68.3% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(63.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (59.3%), Newark has a value of 68.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(59.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Newark has a value of 68.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Size of Labor Force

25,593
Persons
(August 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Newark (25,593) is less and worse than the previously measured value (25,620).
Prior Value
(25,620)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Unemployed Veterans

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Unemployed Veterans

2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (3.0%), Newark has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.3%), Newark has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.2%), Newark has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
5.0%
(August 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (5.9%), Newark has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.4%), Newark has a value of 5.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Newark (5.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.1%).
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
40.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (43.2%), Newark has a value of 40.8%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(43.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Newark has a value of 40.8%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Newark has a value of 40.8%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 1.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 1.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (0.8%), Newark has a value of 1.6% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Newark has a value of 1.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Newark has a value of 1.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Homeownership

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Homeownership

66.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (51.0%), Newark has a value of 66.5%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(51.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), Newark has a value of 66.5%.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Newark has a value of 66.5%.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Median Household Gross Rent

$2,644
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of $2,644 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,597 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,072.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,102 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($2,229), Newark has a value of $2,644 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
($2,229)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($1,856), Newark has a value of $2,644 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($1,856)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Newark has a value of $2,644 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$688
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of $688 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than $656 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $833.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,179 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($888), Newark has a value of $688 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
($888)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($732), Newark has a value of $688 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($732)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Newark has a value of $688 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$3,511
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of $3,511 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,244 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,800.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,098 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($3,547), Newark has a value of $3,511 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
($3,547)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($2,759), Newark has a value of $3,511 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($2,759)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Newark has a value of $3,511 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Overcrowded Households

9.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 9.3% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (7.4%), Newark has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Newark has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Newark has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Newark Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

46.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 46.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 46.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (48.9%), Newark has a value of 46.4% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Newark has a value of 46.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Newark has a value of 46.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Income Inequality

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Income Inequality

0.396
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 0.396 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.422 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.463.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 0.396 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.404 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.452.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (0.469), Newark has a value of 0.396 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(0.469)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.490), Newark has a value of 0.396 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Newark has a value of 0.396 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Median Household Income

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Median Household Income

$159,465
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of $159,465 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $81,483 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $59,688.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,291 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of $159,465 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $61,726 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $48,125.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,419 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($122,488), Newark has a value of $159,465 which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
($122,488)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($91,905), Newark has a value of $159,465 which is higher and better.
CA Value
($91,905)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Newark has a value of $159,465 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Per Capita Income

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Per Capita Income

$62,417
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of $62,417 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $37,615 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $25,434.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,448 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of $62,417 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $31,134 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $24,781.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,512 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($60,193), Newark has a value of $62,417 which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
($60,193)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($45,591), Newark has a value of $62,417 which is higher and better.
CA Value
($45,591)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Newark has a value of $62,417 which is higher and better.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.4%), Newark has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Newark has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Newark has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 2.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 2.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.5%), Newark has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Newark has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Newark has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
8.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (10.4%), Newark has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Newark has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Newark has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
88.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 88.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 88.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (80.6%), Newark has a value of 88.1% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(80.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Newark has a value of 88.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Newark has a value of 88.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.2%), Newark has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Newark has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Newark has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

City/Place: Newark Veterans Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,333 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 3.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,072 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (7.0%), Newark has a value of 3.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (7.7%), Newark has a value of 3.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Newark has a value of 3.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

City/Place: Newark Youth not in School or Working

0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (0.6%), Newark has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(0.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Newark has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Newark has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

City/Place: Newark

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Newark People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
43.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 43.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 43.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (50.9%), Newark has a value of 43.9% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(50.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Newark has a value of 43.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Newark has a value of 43.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
89.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 89.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 89.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (89.2%), Newark has a value of 89.1% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(89.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Newark has a value of 89.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Newark has a value of 89.1%.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Newark Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
93.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Newark has a value of 93.7% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 99.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 94.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,334 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Newark has a value of 93.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 98.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,080 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (95.0%), Newark has a value of 93.7% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.1%), Newark has a value of 93.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (95.0%), Newark has a value of 93.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Newark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.