Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Alameda Census Tracts
  • County : Alameda Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 20.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 20.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (18.1%), Cherryland has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (16.6%), Cherryland has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Cancer

4.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.5%), Cherryland has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Cherryland has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Cancer (Non-Skin) or Melanoma

Current Value:
5.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (6.4%), Cherryland has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (8.2%), Cherryland has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

79.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 79.2% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 79.2% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (79.0%), Cherryland has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(79.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Cherryland has a value of 79.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Colon Cancer Screening: Sigmoidoscopy Past 5 Years and FOBT Past 3 Years, Colonoscopy Past 10 Years, or FOBT Past Year

61.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 61.2% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 61.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (67.7%), Cherryland has a value of 61.2% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Cherryland has a value of 61.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
53.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 53.6% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 53.6% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 65.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (59.5%), Cherryland has a value of 53.6% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(59.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (66.3%), Cherryland has a value of 53.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

72.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 72.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 72.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,874 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (74.5%), Cherryland has a value of 72.7% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(74.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (76.5%), Cherryland has a value of 72.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Diabetes

15.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (12.4%), Cherryland has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (15.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
41.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (21.5%), Cherryland has a value of 41.2% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Cherryland has a value of 41.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Cherryland has a value of 41.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Children with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Children with a Disability

4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (3.0%), Cherryland has a value of 4.5%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Cherryland has a value of 4.5%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Cherryland has a value of 4.5%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.0%), Cherryland has a value of 7.9%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Cherryland has a value of 7.9%.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Cherryland has a value of 7.9%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with a Disability

15.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.5%), Cherryland has a value of 15.2%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Cherryland has a value of 15.2%.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Cherryland has a value of 15.2%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.3%), Cherryland has a value of 3.1%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.9%), Cherryland has a value of 3.1%.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Cherryland has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.3%), Cherryland has a value of 3.7%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.7%), Cherryland has a value of 3.7%.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Cherryland has a value of 3.7%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with a Vision Difficulty

3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (1.8%), Cherryland has a value of 3.0%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.1%), Cherryland has a value of 3.0%.
CA Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Cherryland has a value of 3.0%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

8.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.9%), Cherryland has a value of 8.4%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Cherryland has a value of 8.4%.
CA Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Cherryland has a value of 8.4%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Veterans with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Veterans with a Disability

28.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (24.6%), Cherryland has a value of 28.1%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.7%), Cherryland has a value of 28.1%.
CA Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (29.8%), Cherryland has a value of 28.1%.
US Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Current Value:
25.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (26.6%), Cherryland has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (25.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.9%).
Prior Value
(21.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

68.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (70.9%), Cherryland has a value of 68.0% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(70.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (76.1%), Cherryland has a value of 68.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

89.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (92.8%), Cherryland has a value of 89.4% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (89.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (90.1%).
Prior Value
(90.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults without Health Insurance

15.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 15.1% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 15.1% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.8%), Cherryland has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Cherryland has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Current Value:
9.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.5%), Cherryland has a value of 9.9% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (9.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.7%).
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Information Technology

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
89.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 89.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 89.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (93.0%), Cherryland has a value of 89.1% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(93.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Cherryland has a value of 89.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Cherryland has a value of 89.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:
94.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 94.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 94.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (96.4%), Cherryland has a value of 94.7% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(96.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Cherryland has a value of 94.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Cherryland has a value of 94.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Persons with an Internet Subscription

89.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 89.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 89.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (94.6%), Cherryland has a value of 89.1% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (93.4%), Cherryland has a value of 89.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Cherryland has a value of 89.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Experienced a Stroke

3.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 3.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 3.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.8%), Cherryland has a value of 3.1% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Cherryland has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
5.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.1%), Cherryland has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Cherryland has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
69.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 69.1% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 69.1% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,969 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (72.2%), Cherryland has a value of 69.1% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(72.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Cherryland has a value of 69.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Heart Disease

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Heart Disease

6.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.1%), Cherryland has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (6.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Cholesterol Test History

82.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 82.9% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 82.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,969 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (84.9%), Cherryland has a value of 82.9% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(84.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Cherryland has a value of 82.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland High Cholesterol Prevalence

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland High Cholesterol Prevalence

31.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 31.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 31.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,969 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (33.4%), Cherryland has a value of 31.8% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(33.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (35.5%), Cherryland has a value of 31.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
27.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (28.8%), Cherryland has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Cherryland has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

22.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 22.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 22.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (19.8%), Cherryland has a value of 22.4% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(19.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (20.7%), Cherryland has a value of 22.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress

Current Value:
18.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (18.8%), Cherryland has a value of 18.9% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (18.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

17.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 17.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (14.1%), Cherryland has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Cherryland has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages

Current Value:
15.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.6%), Cherryland has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (15.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6%).
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

25.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 26.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,471 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,400 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (30.9%), Cherryland has a value of 25.9% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(30.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Cherryland has a value of 25.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

33.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 33.5% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 33.5% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,400 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (38.2%), Cherryland has a value of 33.5% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Cherryland has a value of 33.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ with a Disability

47.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (30.8%), Cherryland has a value of 47.9%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(30.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (33.5%), Cherryland has a value of 47.9%.
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Cherryland has a value of 47.9%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

18.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (11.1%), Cherryland has a value of 18.6%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.9%), Cherryland has a value of 18.6%.
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Cherryland has a value of 18.6%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
16.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.7%), Cherryland has a value of 16.8%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Cherryland has a value of 16.8%.
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Cherryland has a value of 16.8%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.5%), Cherryland has a value of 5.0%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Cherryland has a value of 5.0%.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Cherryland has a value of 5.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
29.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (16.1%), Cherryland has a value of 29.5%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (16.4%), Cherryland has a value of 29.5%.
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Cherryland has a value of 29.5%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Oral Health

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

12.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 12.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,871 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.8%), Cherryland has a value of 12.3% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.2%), Cherryland has a value of 12.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Visited a Dentist

58.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 58.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 58.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (65.4%), Cherryland has a value of 58.4% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(65.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (63.9%), Cherryland has a value of 58.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(63.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Children who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Children who Visited a Dentist

85.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (85.2%), Cherryland has a value of 85.6% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(85.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (85.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (87.7%).
Prior Value
(87.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Arthritis

18.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 18.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 18.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (20.5%), Cherryland has a value of 18.1% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(20.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (26.6%), Cherryland has a value of 18.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Kidney Disease

2.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.7%), Cherryland has a value of 2.7%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Cherryland has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who are Sedentary

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who are Sedentary

23.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 23.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 23.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Cherryland has a value of 23.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Asthma

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Asthma

19.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (20.1%), Cherryland has a value of 19.6% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (19.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.9%).
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with COPD

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with COPD

5.3%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.3%), Cherryland has a value of 5.3% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Cherryland has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults with Current Asthma

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.9%), Cherryland has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (9.9%), Cherryland has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Children and Teens with Asthma

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Children and Teens with Asthma

7.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (6.9%), Cherryland has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (7.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.2%).
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults who Smoke

7.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.8%), Cherryland has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (7.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

City/Place: Cherryland Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

Current Value:
5.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.5%), Cherryland has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (5.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Adults Who Are Obese

24.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 24.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 24.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Cherryland has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Children who are Overweight for Age

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Children who are Overweight for Age

17.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (11.6%), Cherryland has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (17.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.1%).
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Teens who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Teens who are Overweight or Obese

54.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (39.2%), Cherryland has a value of 54.8% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(39.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (54.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (34.9%).
Prior Value
(34.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

80.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (85.1%), Cherryland has a value of 80.9% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(85.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (80.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (85.2%).
Prior Value
(85.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Insufficient Sleep

37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 37.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (34.9%), Cherryland has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(34.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (36.0%), Cherryland has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

City/Place: Cherryland Older Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

68.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (74.8%), Cherryland has a value of 68.2% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(74.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Cherryland (68.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (71.9%).
Prior Value
(71.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

13.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (11.0%), Cherryland has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (12.7%), Cherryland has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Current Value:
21.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 21.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 21.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (15.5%), Cherryland has a value of 21.6% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (17.9%), Cherryland has a value of 21.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Average Household Size

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Average Household Size

3.20
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.80), Cherryland has a value of 3.20.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.80)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.90), Cherryland has a value of 3.20.
CA Value
(2.90)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Cherryland has a value of 3.20.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Foreign Born Persons

33.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (33.3%), Cherryland has a value of 33.1%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (26.5%), Cherryland has a value of 33.1%.
CA Value
(26.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Cherryland has a value of 33.1%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Veteran Population

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Veteran Population

4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (3.4%), Cherryland has a value of 4.6%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.7%), Cherryland has a value of 4.6%.
CA Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Cherryland has a value of 4.6%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Children in Single-Parent Households

21.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 21.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 21.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (19.0%), Cherryland has a value of 21.8% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Cherryland has a value of 21.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Cherryland has a value of 21.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland People 65+ Living Alone

21.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 21.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 21.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,328 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (22.6%), Cherryland has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(22.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Cherryland has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Cherryland has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Mean Travel Time to Work

29.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 29.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.2 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,265 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 29.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (32.6), Cherryland has a value of 29.2 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(32.6)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Cherryland has a value of 29.2.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Cherryland has a value of 29.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (10.6%), Cherryland has a value of 3.1% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), Cherryland has a value of 3.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Cherryland has a value of 3.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

City/Place: Cherryland Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Workers who Drive Alone to Work

76.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 76.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 79.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,454 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 76.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 85.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,625 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (54.7%), Cherryland has a value of 76.9% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(54.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), Cherryland has a value of 76.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Cherryland has a value of 76.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Workers who Walk to Work

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.8%), Cherryland has a value of 1.1% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), Cherryland has a value of 1.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Cherryland has a value of 1.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Employment

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
52.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 52.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 45.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,474 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 52.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,799 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (61.3%), Cherryland has a value of 52.2% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(61.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (57.8%), Cherryland has a value of 52.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Cherryland has a value of 52.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
56.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 56.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 56.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (63.6%), Cherryland has a value of 56.9% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(63.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (59.3%), Cherryland has a value of 56.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(59.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Cherryland has a value of 56.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Unemployed Veterans

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Unemployed Veterans

6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (3.0%), Cherryland has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.3%), Cherryland has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.2%), Cherryland has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
49.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (43.2%), Cherryland has a value of 49.4%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(43.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Cherryland has a value of 49.4%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Cherryland has a value of 49.4%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Homeowner Vacancy Rate

0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (0.8%), Cherryland has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Cherryland has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Cherryland has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Homeownership

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Homeownership

29.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (51.0%), Cherryland has a value of 29.6%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(51.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), Cherryland has a value of 29.6%.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Cherryland has a value of 29.6%.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Median Household Gross Rent

$2,084
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of $2,084 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,597 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,072.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,102 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($2,229), Cherryland has a value of $2,084 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
($2,229)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($1,856), Cherryland has a value of $2,084 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($1,856)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Cherryland has a value of $2,084 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

Current Value:
$721
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of $721 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than $656 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $833.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,179 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($888), Cherryland has a value of $721 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
($888)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($732), Cherryland has a value of $721 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($732)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Cherryland has a value of $721 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$2,545
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of $2,545 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,244 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,800.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,098 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($3,547), Cherryland has a value of $2,545 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
($3,547)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($2,759), Cherryland has a value of $2,545 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($2,759)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Cherryland has a value of $2,545 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Overcrowded Households

19.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 19.4% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (7.4%), Cherryland has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Cherryland has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Cherryland has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Cherryland Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Current Value:
55.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 55.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 55.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (48.9%), Cherryland has a value of 55.8% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Cherryland has a value of 55.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Cherryland has a value of 55.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Income Inequality

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Income Inequality

0.399
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 0.399 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.422 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.463.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 0.399 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.404 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.452.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (0.469), Cherryland has a value of 0.399 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(0.469)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.490), Cherryland has a value of 0.399 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Cherryland has a value of 0.399 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Median Household Income

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Median Household Income

$80,921
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of $80,921 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $81,483 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $59,688.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,291 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of $80,921 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $61,726 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $48,125.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,419 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($122,488), Cherryland has a value of $80,921 which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
($122,488)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($91,905), Cherryland has a value of $80,921 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($91,905)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Cherryland has a value of $80,921 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Per Capita Income

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Per Capita Income

$31,130
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of $31,130 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $37,615 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $25,434.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,448 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of $31,130 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $31,134 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $24,781.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,512 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($60,193), Cherryland has a value of $31,130 which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
($60,193)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($45,591), Cherryland has a value of $31,130 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($45,591)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Cherryland has a value of $31,130 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Children Living Below Poverty Level

11.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.4%), Cherryland has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Cherryland has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Cherryland has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Families Living Below Poverty Level

6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.5%), Cherryland has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Cherryland has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Cherryland has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 8.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 8.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (10.4%), Cherryland has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Cherryland has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Cherryland has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
70.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 70.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 70.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (80.6%), Cherryland has a value of 70.0% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(80.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Cherryland has a value of 70.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Cherryland has a value of 70.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland People Living Below Poverty Level

11.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.2%), Cherryland has a value of 11.7% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Cherryland has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Cherryland has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

City/Place: Cherryland Veterans Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Veterans Living Below Poverty Level

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,333 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,072 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (7.0%), Cherryland has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (7.7%), Cherryland has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Cherryland has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

City/Place: Cherryland Youth not in School or Working

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 2.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (0.6%), Cherryland has a value of 2.0% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(0.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Cherryland has a value of 2.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Cherryland has a value of 2.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

City/Place: Cherryland

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Cherryland People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
16.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (50.9%), Cherryland has a value of 16.6% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(50.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Cherryland has a value of 16.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Cherryland has a value of 16.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
69.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 69.6% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 69.6% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (89.2%), Cherryland has a value of 69.6% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(89.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Cherryland has a value of 69.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Cherryland has a value of 69.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Cherryland Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
86.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 86.4% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 99.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 94.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,334 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cherryland has a value of 86.4% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 98.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,080 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (95.0%), Cherryland has a value of 86.4% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.1%), Cherryland has a value of 86.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (95.0%), Cherryland has a value of 86.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cherryland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.